This guest post is by Matt Brandon, a travel photographer now based in Malaysia. He works with NGO's “to tell their stories and to train their field staff to do the same.” Please follow Matt on Twitter. He is a terrific resource, as you will see from his blog post here.

One of the most frustrating things that can happen to you when you travel is getting to a new and amazing place only to get sick. Then having to spend the next several days recovering. It happens way too often and used to happen to me … a lot. In fact, travelers' diarrhea (TD) is the most common illness affecting travelers. Each year between 20-50% of international travelers, an estimated 10 million persons, develop diarrhea. (from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) I used to suffer from TD a lot till I got a few simple little tricks under my belt. Please, don't misunderstand what I am saying, I still get sick, just not as often with travelers' diarrhea . Quite frankly, most of the time it is just a cold or the flu because I have pushed my self too hard for too long. Thankfully for me the infamous “Delhi belly”, “Montezuma's revenge”, “Aztec two step”, “Thai-dal wave” or the “Katmandu quickstep” is much a thing of the past. Why? Because I take some simple precautions.

First let's define some terms. There is travelers' diarrhea or TD and traveler's stomach. I differentiate the two because often when you travel you eat new and strange food and it takes a few days for your system to get use to it. Don't panic, often these new spices are hard on your gut and on top of that, your internal clock is messed up so you just need time to adjust. It is a recipe for upset stomach. After a few days things will settle down and life will be good again. But, full-on TD, aka Delhi Belly, is a sanitation issue and can be quite dangerous. It is often bacteria from bad water, poorly handled food or quite frankly from your own hands and it is bad news. Not to gross you out, but this bacteria lives in feces – as in poo – you know, sh*t. So how does this … stuff get into your mouth? The reality is in many of the countries I visit people often use their left hand to clean themselves after they defecate. Thus, the whole idea of the left hand being unclean and eating with your right hand. But unfortunately cooks don't use only their right hand to prepare food. Plus many of the countries I visit have water systems that have long ago failed. To get clean water you would have to drink it right from the filtration plant. You see, most of the city's pipes are rusted and cracked allowing every sort of germ and bacteria to enter the city's water system. So, what do I do to prevent these little germs from entering my system?

Pretty simple really. The best way to insure this is: if in doubt, don't. If you think the water in your hotel is not properly treated or that the country as a whole has dicey water purification, then drink bottled water. For the most part bottled water is fine. If it is legitimate. I am sure you saw “Slum Dog Millionaire” where they casually fill old bottles with tap water, reglue the tops and serve them to unsuspecting guest. This isn't very common, but it is good to inspect and open them yourself.

I know many people who will also brush their teeth with bottled water. It is a good practice to get into. I generally don't, but then my gut, after living in India for 13 years is a little stronger than most. What if you don't have bottled water available? If you don't have it, then you can boil it. This last trip to China, I went off to bed and didn't have any bottled water and I needed to take some medicine. The hotel had a tea kettle in the room so I simply boiled some water and then let it cool and I was good to go. Boiling water is great, but remember, if you are at higher altitude water boils at a lower temperature. To kill those bugs the water temp needs to be at or above 170º F or 76º C or so I have been told.

Another little thing that some folks forget, is avoiding ice. Freezing water does not kill anything and once you put frozen bad water into your clean water, you get a nice cup of cold bad water.

I generally don't worry about tea and most of the time coffee. Most tea needs to be boiled to be steeped and so you are safe. If the coffee is Nescafe, like most coffee in Asia (who knows why?!) make sure the water is boiled. It only takes warm to hot water to make Nescafe and warm water won't kill all the bugs. Here is a general rule of thumb, if it can't burn your tongue it wont kill the bugs.

Here is another little tip. Stay away from uncooked food like raw fruits and vegetables unless you can peel them. In many South Asian countries you are served raw onions or radishes in a small plate before the meal – sort of a salad. Think of them as a plate of poison! Don't eat them. There are many reasons why they could be contaminated. First is they just might not be washed and you could be eating something that was handled by everyone in the market where it was purchased. Yuck! As your mother once said, “You don't know were those hands have been!” Another reason is the cook's hands may not be clean. One more reason is that if those veggies were washed, the water used was probably right form the tap and may still be present on the food. Not good. OK, now that I have grossed you out, lets move on.

Stay away from shellfish and most uncooked sea foods. Sea food is a risk anytime. It can harbor all kinds of nasties, but when you are traveling to countries you might describe as “developing”, make it a habit to just say no! It is not worth hours and hours of hugging the toilet or wearing down the carpet between your bed and the bathroom in your hotel room.

One last way you can prevent these guys from kicking your butt is treating them prophylactic. Now, I don't do this, but I have known a few doctors who I have traveled with that will take 2 tablets of Pepto Bismol 4 times daily or 2 fluid ounces 4 times daily as a prophylactic for travelers' diarrhea. They swear by this and I never saw them sick on the trip. At least not with E. Coli or giardia.

So prevention is great, but what happens if you get E. Coli or giardia in your tummy? First understand that E. Coli is bacteria and giardia is a little bug and they do different things to you and must be treated differently. Not all baddies are created equal.

Let me say here, I am not a doctor and I am not prescribing a treatment. I am telling you what I do and that is it. There is a good chance you have a bacteria like E. Coli when you have a sudden onset of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, bloating and fever. If I can, I will go to a medical lab and give them a stool specimen. But often I am not in an area where I can do that so I must self diagnose and self medicate. Commonly prescribed treatment is 500 mg of ciprofloxacin twice a day or 400 mg of norfloxacin twice a day for 3-5 days. I have had doctors tell me if the symptoms leave after a day then you can stop. It is not like taking a full course of antibiotics. If you can manage to ride it out and have time to stay in bed for a day or two… or three it might resolve its self. Most cases are benign and resolve in 1-2 days without treatment. TD is rarely life-threatening. The natural history of TD is that 90% of cases resolve within 1 week, and 98% resolve within 1 month. (source, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) But I never have that kind of time or the willingness to hang out at my toilet bowl for a month. So I nuke these guys.

Giardia's symptoms are not as violent as E. Coli. Usually giardia will show up over a longer time and come on gradually as diarrhea, nasty rotten egg smelling gas or flatulence, greasy stool that can float, stomach cramps, upset stomach or nausea especially after a meal. Again, if you can, it's best to go to a clinic and get tested. Often you will have to give several stool samples for giardia as it shows up intermittent. Treatment for this little bug (and it is a real bug by the way) is with metronidazole or tinidazole.

Often diagnosis is hard to tell without lab test and if your up in the mountains that just might not be possible. In India and other countries where these bugs are prevalent you can find a cocktail of one of the “zole” drugs and an antibiotic i.e. tinidazole and norfloxacin. This combination will just about kill everything. When I say everything, I mean it and that is not always good. Your gut needs bacteria in it. So you can travel with pro-biotics or you can eat the local yogurt. I know many folks don't like yogurt, but the local stuff is really good for you. Because it has all the local bacteria and can actually strengthen your tummy.

So, there you go. That is how I keep my gut healthy when I am on the road in some really dicey places. In closing, remember, I am not a doctor and you should never use this blog post as a way to diagnose your illness, The best thing you can do is get to a good clinic or hospital if you think you have these symptoms and get checked out and listen to your doctor.

I imagine Scott Jordan, the CEO of the stylish, yet very functional ScotteVest is on a mission to be heard and seen by everyone. Yes, including photographers.

I received a direct message from him on Twitter asking me to check out a link regarding a ScotteVest advertisement that Delta Airlines had rejected. It was a similar advertisement to the one his company published in The New York Times.

Here is the advertisement in its original form:

You can only imagine why the advertisement was rejected by Delta. It calls out a spate of US airlines that have opted to charge additional baggage fees if you decide to fly with them. And it gives travelers a very viable solution – the ScotteVest – to “beat the system.”

Let me be clear – I do not own a ScotteVest product (yet). And this isn't a paid or unpaid advertisement for Scott Jordan or his company. I have received nothing in exchange for blogging about this issue. I used to love getting on a plane and traveling. I have traveled to Europe, East Asia and to just about every state in the US. Well, the airlines industry in the US have found ways to make it intolerable (save for one airlines called Southwest).

When the “extra baggage fees” were announced, I knew I would be flying less. Not that I carry a stack of suitcases when I photograph domestic or international weddings, but the very fact that airlines in the US had found a way to essentially tax me over and above what it costs to fly with them, well, irked me to no end. Note the distinction – we are referring to these new charges for “extra” baggage not just “excess” baggage. From my understanding, one is charged “excess” baggage if and when one goes over a certain amount of weight per suitcase AND also has an additional bag to check in. Fine. We've lived and put up with that for a while and it makes sense. You can't have one person flying with 10 suitcases all filled to the brim. “Extra” baggage charges, which I am lamenting about now, is when an airline deems it necessary to charge you for ANY checked bag; weight and dimension limits also remain in full effect, of course. If you were traveling for just an overnight trip, you may be able to get away with a duffel bag or a carry-on suitcase (though there are rumblings already that those TOO may be incur a charge!!). However, if you are traveling for a week or more, you will want to carry more with you. Add traveling with children to the mix and you parents know that things become quite a production.

In my opinion, this nickel-and-diming is surely the first step towards a very slippery slope for the airline industry. I wonder if charging us to use the bathrooms on their flights, where we would be required to swipe our credit cards to open the door, would be the next logical step. I am sure some bean-counter is already salivating at the very thought. Where and when airlines should be encouraging travel, they have found innovative and asinine solutions to tax passengers, disrupt and frustrate people's lives.

In again a Twitter exchange, my friend Steven Frischling (whose blog Flying With Fish you must read), says:

So do you think Delta or any other airline will want to turn away nearly $735 million every year? No way! Airlines have forgotten that traveling by air used to be a positive experience. Now, it's more of a nightmare, especially with necessary security checks and other unforeseeable delays. So here comes an innovative company with a great product to make people's lives a little bit easier when they travel. But no, the airlines will have none of it.

Scott Jordan's appeal is simple. This is a David vs. the Goliath, he says. And I agree. This is about the little man/woman being constantly stepped on. ScotteVest products may provide a traveler the ideal solution to carrying a lot of the things one would normally check-in, but I somehow doubt every traveler will opt for a jacket in lieu of checking in a couple of suitcases. To that end, I think Delta is being just plain silly for rejecting the advertisement in Delta Sky, their in-flight magazine. By denying ScotteVest's advertisement to appear in their magazine, they have inadvertently (and to Jordan's glee, I am sure) created a maelstrom of interest in his offerings. Isn't all publicity, still good publicity?

Read Scott Jordan's official statement on Delta's decision to reject his “Beat the System – how to avoid extra bag fees” advertisement.

What do you think? Is Scott Jordan's appeal much ado about nothing or are you also frustrated by the baggage fees that airlines are charging you when you travel and want a solution you can use? As a photographer how have the new baggage allowances affected the way you travel and ultimately your business? Send a message to the airlines by commenting below!

This blog post is by Taiwain-based culture & travel photographer Craig Ferguson. You should follow him on Twitter.

One step forward and two steps back seems to be the pattern for a lot of photographers lately, particularly in the area of cultural travel photography. Falling editorial rates and increased competition make things tougher for all. For me personally, potentially beneficial long-term opportunities in the world of travel photography have recently opened up (one step forward) but at the cost of tougher times in the short-term (two steps back).

Choosing to forgo immediate gain in order to focus on the medium and longer term future isn't always easy. I recently sent off the last of a series of photographs to a publisher. It's unlikely that I'll see any licensing fees from this until 2011 at the earliest, even though putting it all together took the best part of the summer. Other than a couple of small and quick portrait shoots and a little bit of editorial travel photography for a regional magazine, the past couple of months have been lean. In the long run, it will be worth it but that doesn't necessarily make it easier to stomach now.

2010 was always going to be a year of major transition for me as I move my photography business away from the general and into a much more specialized direction. That transition is still ongoing and becomes frustrating at times, as the bulk of my time is now spent in front of a computer rather than behind a lens. This recent project was a vital step in that process but it was only a step. Completing one major task would, in a perfect world, be cause for celebration and signify time to take a break. In reality though, it's just another box to tick and task to cross off the list. Almost as soon as the DVD's full of photographs were dropped off at Fedex, it was back to the grindstone. Seeking out, researching and reaching out to new potential clients. A day full of crafting individualized, cold email introductions to a market that is not covered by Agency Access and the like. When that day is over, I end up with a stack of further possibilities for the future to investigate and approach. It's not a task for the impatient but at the same time, it's a task that must be done sooner rather than later.

So why do it? Why not take travel photos for fun and work in something else, something that provides a regular salary? I know plenty of photographers who have done just that. They work a full time, salaried job and save photography for the weekends. For some people, that's the best thing to do. Not for me however. Why? It's quite simple.

I am a photographer. More accurately, I am a cultural travel photographer. It's what I do. It's who I am. It gives me more than I could ever hope to repay. It's a passion. I have no choice. I can't not do it.

Short term pain may well be necessary for long term gain, and if that is the case, then so be it. Photography is a calling and when you've been called, you have no other options.